(no subject)
Sep. 18th, 2004 06:20 pmApparently there's a bill before the Senate to change federal law so that anyone involved in health care, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and health insurance companies, can refuse to have anything to do with abortions if they suffer from moral or religious objections. Here are some useful links:
As someone else pointed out, it's like the scene in Monty Python and the Meaning of Life where the Irish Catholic family sings "Every Sperm Is Sacred".
Isn't. That. Just. Ducky.
- Ginmar's journal entry where I first read about this.
- The CNN story
- Text of the bill and analysis
- Example of "Pharmacists For Life" in action
As someone else pointed out, it's like the scene in Monty Python and the Meaning of Life where the Irish Catholic family sings "Every Sperm Is Sacred".
Isn't. That. Just. Ducky.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-20 06:44 pm (UTC)You feel that they are not doing their job, or that they should not be in such a field if they have such strong reservations about the medication they are handing out. This is a valid opinion. They feel that they are doing their job, in the right field of work, and on a fundamental level. To their minds, that opinion is as justified as yours is in your mind.
I do agree that someone who is considering going into pharmacy, if they feel so strongly, should not, or should go into an area where they will not be in direct response of administration/prescribtion.
Personally I would not with-hold medication. I have serious reservations about abortions and about the ways in which some people obtain their prescriptions and the reasons for which they do so, but with-holding medication is akin to putting a band-aid on a broken knee. Laws need to be changed in order for abortion to change. I would rather focus my energiues there, as most people would, on both sides.
By the same token, I don't like having other's views forced on me. So were I in such a position and someone came in and began telling me I was evil and deficient for my pro-life stance I might have a bit of a problem in deciding whether or not they were any better than myself for their being such a hypocrite.
The problem with abortion is that it comes down to fundamental beliefs formed very early in life or as a result of major events or paradigm shifts. Semantics can be argued back and forth yet, like politics, one side will always see things differently than the other, because neither side ever feels as if they are in the wrong, and both sides always feel that the other side is somehow deficient in their thinking processes. It's human bias.
Anyhow now I'm moving off the topic.