I'm not trying to debate anything. The only reason I commented in your journal was because I was unable to reply to your comment in ginmar's post, because I was immediately banned after mentioning that Jameth wasn't involved in Frienditto, and you had no email address or alternative way to contact you aside from an LJ comment. Essentially the only thing I wanted to mention was that Ed Rodriguez was convicted of sexual contact *with a child under the age of 13*. You seemed to be under the impression that the teenage boys in question were of an age of consent that would vary from state to state, when in fact they were children under 13. And the part about the IRL name wasn't provided by Jameth himself, it was provided by the state where Ed Rodriguez was convicted, I think Illinois, so your concern there should really be with the state and not with Jameth for posting a link to the state's site.
I'm a little confused as to why you would say you aren't interested in discussing any of this and then made a lengthy response, and since your mind is clearly made up there's probably no point in discussing this. One point of clarification, though, is that in the ditto_cops thread where everyone is accusing Jameth of creating Frienditto, almost all of the accusers are friends of Jameth's, i.e. that was an elaborate prank on their part to "blame Jameth for Frienditto."
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
Re: *sigh*
Date: 2008-05-27 04:39 am (UTC)I'm a little confused as to why you would say you aren't interested in discussing any of this and then made a lengthy response, and since your mind is clearly made up there's probably no point in discussing this. One point of clarification, though, is that in the ditto_cops thread where everyone is accusing Jameth of creating Frienditto, almost all of the accusers are friends of Jameth's, i.e. that was an elaborate prank on their part to "blame Jameth for Frienditto."